Why Cellphone OEMs Choose Android OS
What does OEM is known as ? OEM stands for Original Equipment Manufacturer.
Do Android OEMs (Samsung, LG, HTC) pay Google a fee each and every cell phone for Android Operating System?
Android is free of charge & OPEN SOURCE. I will tell you as I worked for Samsung in Android Operating System team. They attain the Android source code then customize based on the demand. Then simply make a build. That’s 100 % optional.
Yes for few technical related stuff (such as patents) you will definitely give royalty , or ready to receive a email “See you in Court”.
So properly for Android, Samsung, LG as well as HTC does not pay out anything.
Nope, Google really doesn’t charge any OEM a licensing fee for Android OS. What can be better than zero cost?
What do OEM phone manufacturers pay Google for their deployment of Android OS?
Nothing in my opinion. Android Operating System is totally free of charge on any device. But however in the event that you want to fork the android from the source and customize it based upon your preferences and also sell it in a extensive scale. You need to get licences to accomplish that through Google inc..
Why is it that mobile OEMs choose Android?
What are the most important reasons a lot of phone OEMs work with Android? Shortage of other solutions? Google’s brand awareness with buyers and also Google’s services (search engine, googlemail, google maps, YouTubeYouTube, and many others.)? Fee?
Two very big primary reasons.
1. Google Play Store
It’s the primary open appstore.
People that don’t wanna buy an iphone just wish to have the most significant alternative appstore in their smartphone and that is definitely android.
For that reason, the other cellular telephone producers (non Apple) are required to make sure that the product can use Google Play!
2. Android OS itself.
It is actually open-source. It is economical to develop for, absolutely no licensing fees. Supports a lot of hardware components and is effortless to develop for.
The open-source license is of Appache type, so they’re able to still insert their very own code to it and make that proprietary (if they need) to achieve many plus points over the opponents crafting suchlike android Operating System mobile handsets.
On other utterly open cellular telephone OSes (according to the GNU licence) this is not feasible because added code should also be open-source with GNU and the handsets would undoubtedly look so much more alike than the custom android versions we have seen nowadays (Friendly to us who really won’t use templates, damaging to manufacturers).
On the much more restrictive OSes, including windows phone OS, you’ll discover so much more constraints on the hardware and I don’t fall for that makers can add as much exclusive code, if any, to the kernal of OS. Hence they are really too restricted on it. What’s more, Windows phone 7 or 8 have a very smaller sized appstore in comparison to the large two….
Accordingly, android reaches a balance between a versatility in open-source and the right to add proprietary code that can be an advantage for the producer.